Siyasi Partilerin Seçim Beyannamelerinde Gençlik ve Spor Yaklaşımlarının İncelenmesi /Analysis of Youth and Sports Approaches in Political Parties' Election Manifestos
Keywords:
Siyasi Partiler, Spor, Seçim BeyannameleriAbstract
ÖZET
Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, TBMM içerisinde gurup kurmuş olan beş siyasi partinin, iktidar ve muhalefet partilerinin seçim beyannamelerinde spora yönelik hedeflerin karşılaştırılması.
Materyal ve Metod: Bu bağlamda partilerin spora yönelik seçim beyannameleri incelenmiş ve benzerlikler, farklılıklar belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada içerik ve durum çalışması yöntemi tercih edilmiştir. Türkiye'de faaliyet içerisinde bulunan tüm siyasi partiler içinden TBMM'de grup oluşturan beş siyasi partinin seçim beyannameleri çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde içerik analizi yöntemi tercih edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Verilerin analiz edilmesinin neticesinde, Türk kültürüne ait "Türk, Türk Milleti" gibi birlik ve beraberliği yansıtan ortak kültürel unsurların siyasi partilerin seçim beyannameleri içerisinde farklı şekillerde yer aldığı saptanmıştır. Çalışma içerisine dahil edilen siyasi partilerin seçim beyannamelerinde vurgu yapılan hususlar; sosyal vatandaşlık, inisiyatif alma becerileri, iletişim, medyatik beceriler, finansal okuryazarlık şeklinde sıralanabilmektedir. Bireylerin sahip olması gereken özellikler dikkate alındığında ise siyasi partilerin birbirlerinden ayrıştıkları görülmektedir. Bu özellikler sosyal ve toplumsal değerler şeklinde vurgulanmıştır. Değerlere en fazla dikkat çeken parti AK Parti iken en az dikkat çeken siyasi topluluk HDP'dir.
Sonuç: 24 Haziran 2018 Seçim Beyannameleri üzerinde yapılan içerik analizleri sonucunda spor kavramını Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi 97, Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi 38, İyi Parti 35, Halkların Demokratik Partisi 19, Vatan Partisi 17 ve Milliyetçi Hareket Partisinin 1 kez kullandığı tespit edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Seçim Beyannameleri, Siyasi Partiler, Spor.
ABSTRACT
Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare the sport-related objectives stated in the election manifestos of the five political parties that formed parliamentary groups within the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TBMM), representing both governing and opposition parties.
Material and Method: Within this framework, the election manifestos of political parties with regard to sports were examined, and their similarities and differences were identified. A content analysis and case study approach was adopted in the study. Among all political parties operating in Türkiye, the election manifestos of the five political parties that formed parliamentary groups in the TBMM were included in the research. Content analysis was employed in the analysis of the obtained data.
Results: As a result of the data analysis, it was determined that common cultural elements reflecting unity and solidarity, such as “Turk” and “Turkish Nation,” which are inherent to Turkish culture, were included in the election manifestos of political parties in different ways. The main issues emphasized in the election manifestos of the political parties included in the study can be listed as social citizenship, initiative-taking skills, communication, media-related competencies, and financial literacy. When considering the characteristics that individuals are expected to possess, it is observed that political parties differ from one another. These characteristics were emphasized in terms of social and societal values. The party that placed the greatest emphasis on values was the Justice and Development Party (AK Party), while the political group that emphasized them the least was the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP).
Conclusions: As a result of the content analyses conducted on the June 24, 2018 Election Manifestos, it was found that the concept of sports was used 97 times by the Justice and Development Party, 38 times by the Republican People’s Party, 35 times by the Good Party, 19 times by the Peoples’ Democratic Party, 17 times by the Patriotic Party, and only once by the Nationalist Movement Party.
Keywords: Election Manifestos, Political Parties, Sports.
References
Alemdağ, C., Alemdağ, S., & Özkara, A. (2018). The analysis of sports high school students’ learning styles in terms of overall academic success. Education and Science, 43(195), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7327
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating e-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Baker, W. (2013). Using e-learning to develop intercultural awareness in ELT: A critical evaluation in a Thai higher education setting. British Council ELT Research Papers, 1, 271–311.
Ballıkaya, E., & Çifçi, F. (2024). Investigation of attitudes of sports sciences faculty students towards learning. International Journal of Sport Exercise and Training Sciences (IJSETS), 10(4), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.18826/useeabd.1557898
Barış, M. F. (2015). An investigation into university students’ attitudes towards distance education: The case of Namık Kemal University. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 5(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.38758
Berk, R. A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtvU in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1–21.
Biçer, H. (2019). Attitudes towards e-learning: A scale adaptation study [Master’s thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
Bray, F. (2007). Gender and technology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36(1), 37–53.
Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2019). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice. Routledge.
Çakır, Z., Tatlısu, B., Şerif Akkaya, A., Harputlu, C., & Karakoyun, Ö. (2021). Beden eğitimi öğretmenleri ile diğer branş öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitim tutumlarının farklı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi (Samsun ili örneği). Her Yönüyle Spor Araştırmaları I (pp. 47–58). Akademisyen Kitabevi.
Çelik, F., & Şahin, H. (2001). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenliği adaylarının cinsiyet ve öğrenim gördükleri sınıf düzeyleri bakımından öğrenme stillerinin incelenmesi (MAKÜ örneği). Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (31), 23–38.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Dikmen, M., & Tuncer, M. (2020). The effect of learning-style-based education on academic achievement. Ege Journal of Education, 21(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.695452
Düzgün, S. (2018). Validation of the Turkish version of the VARK learning styles inventory with confirmatory factor analysis: A sample of teachers. Turkish Studies, 13(11), 1619–1634. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.13442
Ercan, O. (2014). The effects of multimedia learning material on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards science courses. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(5), 608–621.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2016). Exploring the impact of digital technologies on professional responsibilities and education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 117–131.
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155.
George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
Hergüner, G., Yaman, Ç., Çağlak Sarı, S., Yaman, M. S., & Dönmez, A. (2021). The effect of online learning attitudes of sports sciences students on their learning readiness to learn online in the era of the new coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 20(1), 68–77.
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20–23.
Kisanga, D. H. (2016). Determinants of teachers’ attitudes towards e-learning in Tanzanian higher learning institutions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5).
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Kuru, O. (2018). E-learning styles of classroom teaching students. Journal of Social Sciences of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, 15(1), 105–114.
Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. (2009). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning Styles Inventory with multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409344507
Liu, D., Ren, Y., Yan, F., Li, Y., Xu, X., & Yu, X. (2019). Psychological impact and predisposing factors of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on general public in China.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358–368.
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Özmen, B., & Atıcı, B. (2014). Learners’ views regarding the use of social networking sites in distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i4.1790
Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084
Rita, D., & Dunn, K. (1993). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should they... can they... be matched? Educational Leadership, 36(4), 238–244.
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
Tham, C. M., & Werner, J. M. (2005). Designing and evaluating e-learning in higher education: A review and recommendations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(2), 15–25.
Türker, Ü. (2017). A comparison of learning style models and preferences of sports sciences faculty students [Master’s thesis, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Institute of Health Sciences]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
Türker, Ü. (2021). The effect of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on anxiety levels and attitudes towards e-learning of higher education students [Doctoral dissertation, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Türkiye]. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Türker, Ü., & Bostancı, Ö. (2023). Learning styles of talented pre-service teachers. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(1), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.144
Ulum, H. (2022). The effects of online education on academic success: A meta-analysis study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 429–450.
Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., Malinovski, T., Vasileva, M., Jovevski, D., & Trajkovik, V. (2015). Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a blended learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 127–135.
Yeşilyurt, E. (2019). Learning style models: An inclusive review study in the context of theoretical foundations. OPUS–International Journal of Society Researches, 14(20), 2169–2226. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.603506
Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/986213.986216
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anatolia Sport Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
